Plea Agreement Explained
20. The Government agrees not to object to the defendant`s request, on recommendation, to assign it to an appropriate prison facility located near its parental homes. The Government also states that it is prepared to communicate to the Bureau of The Prison, at the request of the accused, factors that may be relevant to the safety of the accused while in custody and to make appropriate recommendations on these factors, including recommendations on personal safety. The parties recognize that it is up to the prison office alone to determine where and to what extent the defendant is actually incarcerated, and this fundamental agreement does not limit the exercise of that discretion. The following year, the Supreme Court ruled that it was acceptable to reward guilty defendants with reduced sentences (Brady v. United States) and that defendants can plead guilty without being guilty, meaning they can make a plea for good business even if they actually feel innocent (Carolina v. Alford). In a fourth plea, the Supreme Court ruled in 1971 that defendants are entitled to appeal if prosecutors violate the conditions set out in oral arguments (Santobello v. New York). In 1978, in Bordenkircher v. Hayes, prosecutors have sometimes threatened to charge defendants who refuse to negotiate as long as they are charged. [P]lea-good deals are just as likely in strong and weak cases.
Prosecutors only have to tailor the offer to the likelihood of a conviction in order to reach an agreement. Thus, weaker cases lead to more lenient and stronger arguments in relative harshness, but the two lead to agreement. [… W]because the case is weak, the parties must rely on the tariff negotiations… But [the negotiation of royalties] is hardly an obstacle. Tariff negotiations in the event of weakness are not the exception; That is the norm across the country. So even if the evidence against the innocent is on average lower, the likelihood of pleas does not depend on guilt. Plea`s good business is so common in California Superior Courts that the Judicial Council of California has issued an optional seven-page form (which contains all mandatory advice prescribed by federal and national law) to help prosecutors and defense attorneys reduce these good cases in written arguments.  An appeal without the Tribunal`s consent has no legal effect.
The Tribunal must ensure that the fundamental agreement is reached on the basis of the defendant`s free will, that the defendant fully recognizes the nature of the fundamental agreement and its consequences. (Article 212 of Georgia`s Code of Criminal Procedure) 22. The defendant agrees that this agreement will quash his allegations of abuse by the U.S. military and that all allegations of ill-treatment be withdrawn. The accused acknowledges that he was not deliberately mistreated by the U.S. military. If the accused believes that the sentence that would be imposed in practice is less than five years` imprisonment (or that it is only a fine), the accused may apply to the public prosecutor for an objection. The defendant is rewarded with a reduction in the penalty and has other benefits (z.B. that the defendant does not pay the taxes of the procedure). The accused must accept the sentence for the counts (although the pleading sentence has some specific points in other compensation proceedings), regardless of the seriousness of the charges. The courts treat oral arguments as contracts between prosecutors and defendants. An accused who breaks a plea is akin to a breach which means that the prosecutor is no longer bound by his involvement in the oral argument.